Comments on: Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/ Making blade servers simple Wed, 16 May 2012 23:03:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bogdan Radu Cetinoiu http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-1836 Bogdan Radu Cetinoiu Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:30:47 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-1836 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/</span></span> http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/

]]> By: Sirchompsalot http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-1451 Sirchompsalot Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:01:00 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-1451 You're an idiot You’re an idiot

]]> By: switchblade http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-1342 switchblade Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:59:00 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-1342 This needs to be updated considerably. Nexus 4000i, New Blades based on Nahalem-EX. This needs to be updated considerably. Nexus 4000i, New Blades based on Nahalem-EX.

]]> By: Blades Made Simple™ » Blog Archive » A Post from the Archive: “Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H” http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-1298 Blades Made Simple™ » Blog Archive » A Post from the Archive: “Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H” Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:29:29 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-1298 [...] Read the original blog>> [...] [...] Read the original blog>> [...]

]]> By: computing system - StartTags.com http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-81 computing system - StartTags.com Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:51:36 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-81 [...] if the storage issues aren't addressed what are the major issue Mojo thinks are issues which are ...Blades Made Simple · Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter HMaking blade servers simple ... Okay perhaps this isn't news anymore, but the reality is Cisco has [...] [...] if the storage issues aren't addressed what are the major issue Mojo thinks are issues which are …Blades Made Simple · Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter HMaking blade servers simple … Okay perhaps this isn't news anymore, but the reality is Cisco has [...]

]]> By: Happy New Year! « BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE) http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Happy New Year! « BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE) Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:39:41 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-44 [...] page views</strong> which started up on November 1, 2009 with my article on <a href=”http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/” target=”_blank”>Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H</a> receiving 238 page [...] [...] page views</strong> which started up on November 1, 2009 with my article on <a href=”http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/&#8221; target=”_blank”>Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H</a> receiving 238 page [...]

]]> By: Blades Made Simple · Happy New Year! http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Blades Made Simple · Happy New Year! Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:38:25 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-43 [...] I received 2,041 page views which started up on November 1, 2009 with my article on Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H receiving 238 page [...] [...] I received 2,041 page views which started up on November 1, 2009 with my article on Cisco UCS vs IBM BladeCenter H receiving 238 page [...]

]]> By: Aneel http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-836 Aneel Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:13:39 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-836 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">oh.. better link here: ucs vs bladecenter h - http://is.gd/4YgOJ</span></span> oh.. better link here: ucs vs bladecenter h – http://is.gd/4YgOJ

]]> By: Cisco’s UCS Software « Kevin Houston's Blade Server Blog http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Cisco’s UCS Software « Kevin Houston's Blade Server Blog Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:38:29 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-3 [...] feature of the UCS Management software.  It will show you the physical layout of the blades to the UCS 6100 Interconnect, it can show you the configurations of the blades in the attached UCS 5108 chassis, it can set the [...] [...] feature of the UCS Management software.  It will show you the physical layout of the blades to the UCS 6100 Interconnect, it can show you the configurations of the blades in the attached UCS 5108 chassis, it can set the [...]

]]> By: rbrambley http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/09/cisco-ucs-vs-ibm-bladecenter-h/comment-page-1/#comment-2 rbrambley Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:57:22 +0000 http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-2 Kevin, I look forward to more of these posts! This is a great comparison for traditional blade server solutions. While IBM clearly has more hardware flexibility and options, Cisco is definitely betting that virtualization is the future, and the UCS's management single pain of glass (UCSM) of HBAs, NICs, and other bladecenter "personality" will be attractive enough to win over customers. No doubt UCS was built for vSphere on FCoE, and it's future looks "cloudy" ;). Kevin,

I look forward to more of these posts! This is a great comparison for traditional blade server solutions.

While IBM clearly has more hardware flexibility and options, Cisco is definitely betting that virtualization is the future, and the UCS’s management single pain of glass (UCSM) of HBAs, NICs, and other bladecenter “personality” will be attractive enough to win over customers. No doubt UCS was built for vSphere on FCoE, and it’s future looks “cloudy” ;).

]]>