<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP BladeSystem Rumours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blades Made Simple &#183; More HP and IBM Blade Rumours</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Blades Made Simple &#183; More HP and IBM Blade Rumours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] going to the Ethernet fabric and the Fibre traffic going to the Fibre fabric (check out this rumour blog I posted a few days ago for details.)  Guess only time will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to the Ethernet fabric and the Fibre traffic going to the Fibre fabric (check out this rumour blog I posted a few days ago for details.)  Guess only time will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More HP and IBM Blade Rumours &#171; BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE)</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>More HP and IBM Blade Rumours &#171; BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-156</guid>
		<description>[...] going to the Ethernet fabric and the Fibre traffic going to the Fibre fabric (check out this rumour blog I posted a few days ago for details.) Guess only time will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to the Ethernet fabric and the Fibre traffic going to the Fibre fabric (check out this rumour blog I posted a few days ago for details.) Guess only time will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-140</guid>
		<description>RE: FCoE offerings from IBM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark - you are absolutely right.  I missed IBM&#039;s announcement on their Virtual Fabric Extension Module, however I plan to write up a post to give some details on this offering very soon.  Thanks for pointing it out to me, and thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: FCoE offerings from IBM</p>
<p>Mark &#8211; you are absolutely right.  I missed IBM&#39;s announcement on their Virtual Fabric Extension Module, however I plan to write up a post to give some details on this offering very soon.  Thanks for pointing it out to me, and thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM&#8217;s New Approach to Ethernet/Fibre Traffic &#171; BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE)</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM&#8217;s New Approach to Ethernet/Fibre Traffic &#171; BladesMadeSimple.com (MIRROR SITE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago, I commented that no one has yet offered the ability to split out Ethernet and Fibre traffic at the chassis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago, I commented that no one has yet offered the ability to split out Ethernet and Fibre traffic at the chassis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blades Made Simple &#183; IBM&#8217;s New Approach to Ethernet/Fibre Traffic</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Blades Made Simple &#183; IBM&#8217;s New Approach to Ethernet/Fibre Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago, I commented that no one has yet offered the ability to split out Ethernet and Fibre traffic at the chassis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago, I commented that no one has yet offered the ability to split out Ethernet and Fibre traffic at the chassis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-137</guid>
		<description>IBM&#039;s BladeCenter H announced this capability two months ago.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0717.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0717....&lt;/a&gt;.  Using the QLogic CNA, the BNT 10GE CEE Ethernet switch, and the QLogic Virtual Fabric Extension Module, the IBM BladeCenter H offers the ability for FCoE to the server, and separate FC and Ethernet uplinks out of a single chassis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The BNT 10Gb Ethernet switch communicates with the QLogic Virtual Fabric Extension Module over the BladeCenter H backplane.  This disables four external BNT ports per QLogic module, as those four connections are used to communicate with the QLogic module.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM&#39;s BladeCenter H announced this capability two months ago.  See <a href="http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0717.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0717..." rel="nofollow">http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0717&#8230;</a>..  Using the QLogic CNA, the BNT 10GE CEE Ethernet switch, and the QLogic Virtual Fabric Extension Module, the IBM BladeCenter H offers the ability for FCoE to the server, and separate FC and Ethernet uplinks out of a single chassis.</p>
<p>The BNT 10Gb Ethernet switch communicates with the QLogic Virtual Fabric Extension Module over the BladeCenter H backplane.  This disables four external BNT ports per QLogic module, as those four connections are used to communicate with the QLogic module.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I believe HP&#039;s initial G7 blade server release will be Intel based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe HP&#39;s initial G7 blade server release will be Intel based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elidezman</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/hp-bladesystem-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>elidezman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=254#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Do you know if G7 will be Intel or AMD based ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if G7 will be Intel or AMD based ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
