<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Blade Server Rumours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 17:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-429</guid>
		<description>yes #ibm announced an iDataplex GPU solution but I don&#039;t focus on non-blade technology on this blog.  HOWEVER it is important to point out that iDataplex is a &quot;solution&quot; that must be bought and ordered from IBM.  It&#039;s not a pay-as-you grow model and you can&#039;t buy a couple of servers and add more in the future like you can with blade servers.  Great point though.  Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes #ibm announced an iDataplex GPU solution but I don&#39;t focus on non-blade technology on this blog.  HOWEVER it is important to point out that iDataplex is a &#8220;solution&#8221; that must be bought and ordered from IBM.  It&#39;s not a pay-as-you grow model and you can&#39;t buy a couple of servers and add more in the future like you can with blade servers.  Great point though.  Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proteus</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Proteus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 08:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-424</guid>
		<description>IBM just announced their iDataplex GPU solution this week. (2 full power Fermi GPUs in a 2 socket, half-depth Nehalem server). 42 dual westmere, dual GPU+Infiniband/10GbE servers in a standard 42U rack footprint. No blade will be able to match that, from any vendor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM just announced their iDataplex GPU solution this week. (2 full power Fermi GPUs in a 2 socket, half-depth Nehalem server). 42 dual westmere, dual GPU+Infiniband/10GbE servers in a standard 42U rack footprint. No blade will be able to match that, from any vendor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leslie gillette</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie gillette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @kevin_houston: RT @Kevin_Houston More Blade Server Rumours http://ow.ly/1qxLIj&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @kevin_houston: RT @Kevin_Houston More Blade Server Rumours <a href="http://ow.ly/1qxLIj" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1qxLIj</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @Kevin_Houston More Blade Server Rumours http://ow.ly/1qxLIj&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @Kevin_Houston More Blade Server Rumours <a href="http://ow.ly/1qxLIj" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1qxLIj</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 02:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Great comments, Mike.  It will be interesting to see how #GPUs on a blade server will be handled, if indeed the rumour is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, Mike.  It will be interesting to see how #GPUs on a blade server will be handled, if indeed the rumour is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Great comments, Nik.  Mike, from #dell mentioned the same thing shortly after you.  It will be interesting to see how the blade vendor handles the power requirement.  Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, Nik.  Mike, from #dell mentioned the same thing shortly after you.  It will be interesting to see how the blade vendor handles the power requirement.  Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike roberts</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>mike roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Kevin,&lt;br&gt;interesting rumours. in order to effectively run GPGPUs you need a couple of things that no blade vendor can really support right now. &lt;br&gt;1) you need a high bandwidth PCIe connection to the host like full x16 gen2 PCIe. PCI-X and gen1 x4 PCIe slots are not enough to handle the bandwidth of these devices&lt;br&gt;2) you need the capability to support very high power cards. the GPGPUs can be up to 250+ Watts each. so you&#039;d need supplimental power connections and much greater power delivery capability than IBM/HP&#039;s &quot;sidecar&quot; PCI expansion blades support today.&lt;br&gt;maybe someone will offer these things in a blade?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;on the high memory blade, would also be nice if someone figured out how to put 18 dimms in a high density blade without requiring expensive, non hot plug SSDs&lt;br&gt;mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />interesting rumours. in order to effectively run GPGPUs you need a couple of things that no blade vendor can really support right now. <br />1) you need a high bandwidth PCIe connection to the host like full x16 gen2 PCIe. PCI-X and gen1 x4 PCIe slots are not enough to handle the bandwidth of these devices<br />2) you need the capability to support very high power cards. the GPGPUs can be up to 250+ Watts each. so you&#39;d need supplimental power connections and much greater power delivery capability than IBM/HP&#39;s &#8220;sidecar&#8221; PCI expansion blades support today.<br />maybe someone will offer these things in a blade?</p>
<p>on the high memory blade, would also be nice if someone figured out how to put 18 dimms in a high density blade without requiring expensive, non hot plug SSDs<br />mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Simpson</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-399</guid>
		<description>The challenge of putting conventional GPUsisn&#039;t trivial. If you look at the current crop of workstation graphics/HPC accelerator GPUs from NVidia there are several problems:

1. They are huge, requiring a full length PCIe slot
2. They draw 250/300 watts/GPU
3. They need dedicated power supply connections

To fit one inside a blade (as opposed to putting it in a separate PCIe/PCIx expansion chassis) is going to take some serious engineering work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The challenge of putting conventional GPUsisn&#8217;t trivial. If you look at the current crop of workstation graphics/HPC accelerator GPUs from NVidia there are several problems:</p>
<p>1. They are huge, requiring a full length PCIe slot<br />
2. They draw 250/300 watts/GPU<br />
3. They need dedicated power supply connections</p>
<p>To fit one inside a blade (as opposed to putting it in a separate PCIe/PCIx expansion chassis) is going to take some serious engineering work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Houston</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/more-blade-server-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 09:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=547#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New blog posting, More Blade Server Rumours - http://tinyurl.com/2aaxko6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New blog posting, More Blade Server Rumours &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2aaxko6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2aaxko6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

