Blades Made Simple
Cisco UCS vs HP Virtual Connect
My friend, M. Sean McGee, wrote up a great blog post in April that deserves revisiting titled, “The State of Statelessness: Cisco UCS vs. HP Virtual Connect“. In the write-up, he discusses Cisco how Unified Computing System (UCS) blade servers are “stateless” and use “UCS Service Profiles”. He identifies 96 server settings that can be handled via the UCS Service Profile vs 12 server settings with HP’s Virtual Connect Server Profile. It is a great read, so I encourage you to take a few minutes and see if you agree with what he writes.
defined benefit plan
megabus promotion code
north kansas city hospital
duns number lookup
new york state department of education
Tagged with: blade servers • Cisco • HP • M. Sean McGee • Service Profiles • UCS • Unified Computing System • Virtual Connect
Categories
- AMD (1)
- ARM (1)
- Cisco (54)
- Citrix (1)
- Cloud Computing (1)
- Comdex (1)
- Dell (70)
- Fujitsu (1)
- Future Technologies (9)
- Gartner (3)
- History (4)
- HP (75)
- HPC (2)
- IBM (73)
- IDC (17)
- Intel (13)
- Market Analysis (6)
- Microserver (1)
- Microsoft (1)
- Networking (1)
- News (2)
- Performance (4)
- Power (4)
- Reviews (2)
- Server Comparisons (18)
- Uncategorized (12)
- Virtualization (1)
- VMmark (2)
- VMware (11)
Blogroll
- Absolute Windows – John Obeto
- BladeWatch – Martin Macleod
- GestaltIT – Stephen Foskett
- HP Storage Blog – Calvin Zito
- iKnerd – Greg Knieriemen
- Infosmack Podcasts – Greg Knieriemen
- M. Sean McGee
- Pack Rat – Stephen Foskett
- Storage Nerve – Devang Panchigar
- Tech Virtuoso – Frank Owen
- TechHead – Simon Seagrave
- The Storage Architect – Chris Evans
- VM Etc – Rich Brambley





Pingback: Kevin Houston
Pingback: Frank Owen
Pingback: M. Sean McGee
Pingback: JanHeijdra(Cisco_NL)
Pingback: James Leach
Pingback: unix player
Pingback: Cisco UCS vs HP Virtual Connect | Blade Servers Directory
Pingback: Kevin Houston