<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blades Made Simple™ &#187; Dell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/category/dell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Announces 3 New Blade Servers&#8211;M820, M520 and M420</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/05/dell-announces-3-new-blade-serversm820-m520-and-m420/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/05/dell-announces-3-new-blade-serversm820-m520-and-m420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Xeon E5-2400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Xeon E5-4600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M420]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M520]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M820]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Dell announced the addition of 3 new blade servers to its PowerEdge portfolio – the PowerEdge M820, PowerEdge M520 and the PowerEdge M420.  Each server offers a unique addition to the Dell blade server family and will be available soon.  PowerEdge M820 The PowerEdge M820 is a full-height, 4-socket blade server that is the first to use the Intel Xeon E5-4600 processor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F05%252Fdell-announces-3-new-blade-serversm820-m520-and-m420%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FKgL5rz%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%20Announces%203%20New%20Blade%20Servers%26ndash%3BM820%2C%20M520%20and%20M420%20%23blade%20server%20%23Dell%20%23Intel%20Xeon%20E5-2400%20%23Intel%20Xeon%20E5-4600%20%23M420%20%23M520%20%23M820%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Today, Dell announced the addition of 3 new blade servers to its PowerEdge portfolio – the PowerEdge M820, PowerEdge M520 and the PowerEdge M420.  Each server offers a unique addition to the Dell blade server family and will be available soon.</p>
<p><span id="more-1800"></span></p>
<p> <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PowerEdge M820</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M820.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 22px 0px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Dell PowerEdge M820" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M820_thumb.jpg" alt="Dell PowerEdge M820" width="154" height="240" align="left" border="0" /></a>The PowerEdge M820 is a full-height, <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">4-socket blade</span></strong> server that is the first to use the <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Intel Xeon E5-4600</span></strong> processor family.  The M820 has 48 DIMMs for up to <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">1.5TB of memory</span></strong> and comes with <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">2 x Select Network Adapters</span></strong> providing a choice between 10Gb Brocade, Broadcom or QLogic.  The server also has <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">4 additional I/O mezzanine card</span></strong> slots capable of holding additional 10Gb, Infiniband or Fibre cards.  The PowerEdge M820 will be available to purchase in mid-Q2 2012.  Find out more at:</p>
<p><a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m820/pd?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m820/pd?~ck=anav">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m820/pd?~ck=anav</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PowerEdge M520</span></strong></p>
<p>If you are familiar with the Dell PowerEdge M610 blade server, <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M520.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Dell PowerEdge M520" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M520_thumb.jpg" alt="Dell PowerEdge M520" width="125" height="115" align="right" border="0" /></a>then the new PowerEdge M520 shouldn’t be any surprise to you.  It offers the same form factor and the same amount of memory, but is based on the newer Intel Sandy Bridge CPU.  The PowerEdge M520 is a half-height, <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">2-socket blade</span></strong> server that uses the <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Intel Xeon E5-2400</span></strong> processor family.  As with most of the servers in the E5-2400 family, the M520 has 12 DIMMs for up to <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">192GB of memory.  </span></strong>Unlike the M820 or the M620, the PowerEdge M520 does not come with the Select Network Adapter, but instead comes standard with <span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>4 x 1GbE Dual Port LOM</strong></span>.  (<em>It is important to note, that a 48-port Blade Module, like the <a href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/powerconnect-m6348/pd?~ck=anav" target="_blank">PowerConnect M6348</a>, is required to have all 4 NICs available for use; otherwise only 2 of the 4 are available.)</em> The server also has <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">2 additional I/O mezzanine card</span></strong> slots capable of holding additional 10Gb, Infiniband or Fibre cards.  The PowerEdge M520 is scheduled to be available for purchase in the next few weeks.  Find out more at:</p>
<p><a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m520/pd?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m520/pd?~ck=anav">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m520/pd?~ck=anav</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PowerEdge M420</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/PowerEdge-M420.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 16px 0px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="PowerEdge M420" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/PowerEdge-M420_thumb.jpg" alt="PowerEdge M420" width="202" height="240" align="left" border="0" /></a>The PowerEdge M420 is a <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">quarter-height</span></strong>, <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">2-socket blade</span></strong> server that uses the <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Intel Xeon E5-2400</span></strong> processor family.  The M420 introduces a new concept to Dell’s blade family by allowing up to 32 servers within a single Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade chassis.  Each PowerEdge M420 blade server has up to <span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>2 x Intel Xeon E5-2400</strong></span> CPUs, 6 DIMM slots (for up to 96GB of memory), 2 internal SD slots, a <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Dual Port 10Gb</span></strong> Broadcom 57810s onboard NIC, <span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>1 x mezzanine expansion</strong></span><span style="color: #000000;">. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The M420 quarter-height blades are deployed in the M1000e using a full-height sleeve known as a “<strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">subassembly</span></strong>”.  While each sleeve does not need to be fully populated with M420 blades in order to be installed, it does occupy the same physical space as a full-height blade, however it can be positioned adjacent to other half-height servers.  The M420 offers a great platform for any application using a lot of CPU processing.  A 42U rack can hold 4 x Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis and each chassis can hold 32 PowerEdge M420 server.  That means you can have up to <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">128 Dell PowerEdge M420s in a rack</span></strong>.  Each M420 can hold 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2400 CPUs with a total of 16 CPU cores so that equates to <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">2,048 CPU cores</span></strong> in a rack.  </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The PowerEdge M420 is scheduled to be available for purchase in the next few weeks.  Find out more at: <a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m420/pd?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m420/pd?~ck=anav">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m420/pd?~ck=anav</a></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For a list of all of Dell’s blade server offerings, visit <a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-mseries-servers?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-mseries-servers?~ck=anav">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-mseries-servers?~ck=anav</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #666666;">Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.  Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market.</span></em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/05/dell-announces-3-new-blade-serversm820-m520-and-m420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test Report: Power Efficiency Comparison of Dell and Cisco High Memory Capacity Blade Servers</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/test-report-power-efficiency-comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/test-report-power-efficiency-comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B230 M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M710HD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell recently published a new whitepaper that compares the performance and power efficiency of four of the Dell PowerEdge M710HD and M620 blades vs. four of the Cisco B250 M2 blade servers.&#160; Here is a summary of the key findings: Performance / watt The higher performance and lower power draw of the four-blade Dell solutions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F04%252Ftest-report-power-efficiency-comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FJZFTg7%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Test%20Report%3A%20Power%20Efficiency%20Comparison%20of%20Dell%20and%20Cisco%20High%20Memory%20Capacity%20Blade%20Servers%20%23B230%20M2%20%23blade%20server%20%23Cisco%20%23Dell%20%23efficiency%20%23M620%20%23M710HD%20%23Power%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Dell recently published a new whitepaper that compares the performance and power efficiency of four of the Dell PowerEdge M710HD and M620 blades vs. four of the Cisco B250 M2 blade servers.&#160; Here is a summary of the key findings:</p>
<p><span id="more-1792"></span>
<p><strong>Performance / watt </strong></p>
<p>The higher performance and lower power draw of the four-blade Dell solutions compared to the UCS B250 M2 blade solution led to the PowerEdge M710HD solution’s 76% higher performance per watt score and the PowerEdge M620 solution’s 108% higher performance per watt score. </p>
<p><strong>Power at Idle </strong></p>
<p>Even with all blades configured with the same amount of system memory, the four-blade PowerEdge M710HD solution consumed 58% as much power at idle as the four-blade UCS B250 M2 solution with its extra DIMMs and supporting circuitry. Similarly, the four-blade PowerEdge M620 blade solution drew just 55% as much power at idle as the Cisco blade solution. </p>
<p><strong>Power at 100% Load</strong> </p>
<p>Both of the four-blade PowerEdge solutions, again with the same amount of system memory installed per blade, drew 64% to 67% as much power as the four-blade Cisco UCS B250 M2 blade solution with all blades running at 100% load. </p>
<p><strong>Performance</strong> </p>
<p>With the same processor models and the same memory capacity installed in each blade, the four-blade solution based on PowerEdge M710HD blades provided up to 11% higher performance than the four-blade solution based on UCS B250 M2 blades, and the four-blade solution based on PowerEdge M620 blades provided up to 25% higher performance than the UCS blade solution. </p>
<p><strong>Rack density </strong></p>
<p>When the 10U M1000e Modular Blade Enclosure is equipped with its maximum of sixteen M710HD or M620 servers, the solution can fit 1.6 servers per rack unit of space, 2.4 times as dense as the solution with Cisco UCS B250 M2 blades. </p>
<p><strong>Cost</strong> </p>
<p>In the configuration tested, the Cisco UCS B250 M2 blade solution costs $112,591.02[1], while the similarly configured Dell PowerEdge M710HD solution costs 34% less at $73,820.00, and the PowerEdge M620 solution costs 33% less at $75,372.00.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>To read the report in its entirety, please visit:</p>
<p><a href="http://i.dell.com/sites/content/shared-content/data-sheets/en/Documents/PowerEfficiencyComparisonofDellandCiscoHighMemoryCapacityBladeServers.pdf">http://i.dell.com/sites/content/shared-content/data-sheets/en/Documents/PowerEfficiencyComparisonofDellandCiscoHighMemoryCapacityBladeServers.pdf</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>To read the writer’s blog post on this report, visit:</p>
<p><a title="http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/enterprise/b/inside-enterprise-it/archive/2012/03/26/comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers.aspx" href="http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/enterprise/b/inside-enterprise-it/archive/2012/03/26/comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers.aspx">http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/enterprise/b/inside-enterprise-it/archive/2012/03/26/comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers.aspx</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><em>Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.&#160; He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.&#160; Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.&#160; Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market.</em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/test-report-power-efficiency-comparison-of-dell-and-cisco-high-memory-capacity-blade-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Announces 40Gb Blade Server Switch: Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/dell-announces-40gb-blade-server-switch-dell-force10-mxl-1040gbe/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/dell-announces-40gb-blade-server-switch-dell-force10-mxl-1040gbe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40Gb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Bridging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlexIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell introduced today a new 40Gb Ethernet Switch module for its Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade system.&#160; The Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE switch is the first Force10 product introduced to the Dell blade server platform.&#160; The Force10 MXL 10/40GbE is a 1/10/40GbE Layer 2 and Layer 3 blade switch and is powered by the Force10 operating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F04%252Fdell-announces-40gb-blade-server-switch-dell-force10-mxl-1040gbe%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FJodNGh%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%20Announces%2040Gb%20Blade%20Server%20Switch%3A%20Dell%20Force10%20MXL%2010%2F40GbE%20%2340Gb%20%23blade%20servers%20%23Data%20Center%20Bridging%20%23Dell%20%23Dell%20Force10%20MXL%2010%2F40GbE%20%23FlexIO%20%23FTOS%20%23iSCSI%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Dell introduced today a new 40Gb Ethernet Switch module for its Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade system.&#160; The Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE switch is the first Force10 product introduced to the Dell blade server platform.&#160; The Force10 MXL 10/40GbE is a 1/10/40GbE Layer 2 and Layer 3 blade switch and is powered by the Force10 operating system (FTOS).&#160; </p>
<p><span id="more-1788"></span>
<p>It will offer 32 internal 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and up to 240Gb of Ethernet uplinks.&#160; </p>
<p>Some of the key features of the Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE switch:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ethernet stacking of up to six switching modules within a single enclosure or spanning multiple enclosures to be managed as one logical device. </li>
<li>Networking flexibility with FlexIO modules that provide support for 40GbE QSFP+, 10GbE SFP+, and 10GBase-T ports.</li>
<li>Support for end-to-end IP storage (iSCSI and Data Center Bridging) into a single 10GbE connection. </li>
</ul>
<p>According to the Dell <a href="http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/secure/2012-04-24-dell-virtual-network-architecture.aspx" target="_blank">press release</a>, the Dell Force10 MXL 10/40GbE will be available this summer.&#160; More details will follow as it is released.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Media Links:</p>
<p>“<strong>Dell brings 40-Gigabit Ethernet to PowerEdge blades</strong>” – ComputerWorld.com</p>
<p><a title="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9226502/Dell_brings_40_Gigabit_Ethernet_to_PowerEdge_blades?taxonomyId=154&amp;pageNumber=1" href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9226502/Dell_brings_40_Gigabit_Ethernet_to_PowerEdge_blades?taxonomyId=154&amp;pageNumber=1">http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9226502/Dell_brings_40_Gigabit_Ethernet_to_PowerEdge_blades?taxonomyId=154&amp;pageNumber=1</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>“<strong>Dell Unveils 40GbE-Enabled Networking Switch</strong>” &#8211; eWeek</p>
<p><a title="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Networking/Dell-Unveils-40GbEEnabled-Networking-Switch-716536/" href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Networking/Dell-Unveils-40GbEEnabled-Networking-Switch-716536/">http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Networking/Dell-Unveils-40GbEEnabled-Networking-Switch-716536/</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>“<strong>Dell Builds on Force10 for Virtual Networking</strong>” – Enterprise Networking Planet</p>
<p><a title="http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/datacenter/dell-builds-on-force10-for-virtual-networking.html" href="http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/datacenter/dell-builds-on-force10-for-virtual-networking.html">http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/datacenter/dell-builds-on-force10-for-virtual-networking.html</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><em>Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.&#160; He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.&#160; Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.&#160; Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market.</em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/04/dell-announces-40gb-blade-server-switch-dell-force10-mxl-1040gbe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization Performance on Blade Servers</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/virtualization-performance-on-blade-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/virtualization-performance-on-blade-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principled Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the industry-leading independent technology assessment service firms, Principled Technologies, just updated their site with a ton of white papers covering performance on just about any product or technology.&#160; You can check out their website at http://www.principledtechnologies.com/default.htm for the complete list, but I wanted to give you the links to their papers that cover [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F03%252Fvirtualization-performance-on-blade-servers%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FyGnwmC%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Virtualization%20Performance%20on%20Blade%20Servers%20%23blade%20server%20%23blade%20servers%20%23Dell%20%23Principled%20Technologies%20%23virtualization%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>One of the industry-leading independent technology assessment service firms, Principled Technologies, just updated their site with a ton of white papers covering performance on just about any product or technology.&#160; You can check out their website at <a title="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/default.htm" href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/default.htm">http://www.principledtechnologies.com/default.htm</a> for the complete list, but I wanted to give you the links to their papers that cover virtualization performance on blade servers.</p>
<p><span id="more-1748"></span>
<p>These are the newest white papers, and yes they are mostly Dell.&#160; However, keep an eye on </p>
<p><a href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/Topics/servers.htm">http://www.principledtechnologies.com/Topics/servers.htm</a> as I’m sure they’ll have HP, IBM and Cisco papers up soon.</p>
<p>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="494">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="25">
<p><strong></strong><strong><img alt="New" align="left" src="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/assets/bugs/green-new-bug.jpg" width="20" height="52" /></strong></p>
<p>         <strong>           <br /></strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="467"><a href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/clients/reports/Intel/Xeon_E5-2690_consolidation_0312.pdf">Database server consolidation with an Intel Xeon processor E5-2690-based server</a> We tested to see how many dual-socket quad-core legacy servers this new server could consolidate using virtualization.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="25">
<p><strong></strong><strong><img alt="New" align="left" src="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/assets/bugs/green-new-bug.jpg" width="20" height="52" /></strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="467"><a href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/clients/reports/Dell/M620_vs_HP_BL490_0312.pdf">Server consolidation and TCO: Dell PowerEdge M620 vs. HP ProLiant BL490</a> We examine the number of virtual machines each server could support and the total cost of ownership for each server over 3 years.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="25">
<p><strong></strong><strong><img alt="New" align="left" src="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/assets/bugs/green-new-bug.jpg" width="20" height="52" /></strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="467">
<p><a href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/clients/reports/Dell/M620_vs_M710HD_0312.pdf">Server consolidation and TCO: Dell PowerEdge M620 vs. Dell PowerEdge M710HD</a> We examine the number of virtual machines each server could support and the total cost of ownership for each server over 3 years.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="25">
<p><strong></strong><strong><img alt="New" align="left" src="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/assets/bugs/green-new-bug.jpg" width="20" height="52" /></strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="467"><a href="http://www.principledtechnologies.com/clients/reports/Dell/M620_vs_M610_0312.pdf"><b>Server consolidation and TCO: Dell PowerEdge M620 vs. Dell PowerEdge M610</b></a> We examine the number of virtual machines each server could support and the total cost of ownership for each server over 3 years</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><em><font color="#666666">Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.&#160; He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.&#160; Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.&#160;&#160;&#160; Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market</font>.</em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/virtualization-performance-on-blade-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell&#8217;s PowerEdge M620 Blade Server Offering Up to 768GB RAM</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/dells-poweredge-m620-blade-server-offering-up-to-768gb-ram/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/dells-poweredge-m620-blade-server-offering-up-to-768gb-ram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerEdge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QR Tag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(UPDATED 3/7/12) With the launch of Intel’s Xeon E5-2600 processor, Dell revealed the details of the new PowerEdge M620 blade server.  Offering an industry first 24 memory DIMMs in a half-height form factor, the M620 offers up to 768GB of RAM along side the newly announced Intel E5-2600.  The Dell PowerEdge M620 also comes with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F03%252Fdells-poweredge-m620-blade-server-offering-up-to-768gb-ram%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FzeLwOw%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%27s%20PowerEdge%20M620%20Blade%20Server%20Offering%20Up%20to%20768GB%20RAM%20%23blade%20server%20%23blade%20servers%20%23Dell%20%23M620%20%23PowerEdge%20%23QR%20Tag%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(<img style="display: inline; float: left;" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dell-PowerEdge-12G-M620.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="120" align="left" />UPDATED 3/7/12)</strong></span> With the launch of Intel’s Xeon E5-2600 processor, Dell revealed the details of the new PowerEdge M620 blade server.  Offering an industry first <strong>24 memory DIMMs</strong> in a half-height form factor, the M620 offers up to <strong>768GB of RAM</strong> along side the newly announced Intel E5-2600.  The Dell PowerEdge M620 also comes with the ability to chose from a variety of LOM (LAN on Motherboard) cards – a feature first seen in the PowerEdge M710HD and M915 <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/06/dell-announces-new-blade-servers-m710hd-and-m610x/" target="_blank">last Summer.</a>  Formerly known as the Network Daughter Card, the newly renamed feature, called <strong>Select Network Adapter</strong>, is a removable network card that gives buyers the option of choosing from Broadcom, Intel or QLogic adapters – each offering up to two ports of 10Gb.  Since it is removable, it offers investment protection as new technology becomes available.  For more features and details about the M620, see below.</p>
<p><span id="more-1729"></span></p>
<p><strong>CPU Offerings</strong></p>
<p>At the time of launch, Dell is offering the following Intel E5-2600 CPUs on the M620:</p>
<p><span style="color: #9b00d3;">Intel® Xeon® E5-2650L 1.80GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 70W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2650 2.00GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 95W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2660 2.20GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 95W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2665 2.40GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 115W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2670 2.60GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 115W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2680 2.70GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 130W </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #9b00d3;">Intel® Xeon® E5-2630L 2.00GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, 6C, 60W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2620 2.00GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, 6C, 95W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2630 2.30GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, 6C, 95W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2640 2.50GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, 6C, 95W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2667 2.90GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, 6C, 130W</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #9b00d3;">Intel® Xeon® E5-2603 1.80GHz,10M Cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, No Turbo, 4C, 80W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2609 2.40GHz, 10M Cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, No Turbo, 4C, 80W<br />
Intel® Xeon® E5-2637 3.0GHz, 5M cache, 6.4 GT/s QPI, Turbo,<strong> 2C,</strong> 80W</span></p>
<p>If you have software licensed by the core, you’ll be happy to see the E5-2637 CPU, which offers 2 CPU cores while maintaining a high 3.0GHz frequency.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Memory</strong></p>
<p>Although the maximum memory speed with the Romley platform running the Intel Xeon E5-2600 CPU touts a 1600MHz memory performance speed, there is a trade off on capacity.  Basically, if you want a lot of memory, you’ll have to run the memory at a slower speed at 1033.   To help determine performance vs capacity, I’ve listed a chart below that should help decode things.  In the spirit of full disclosure, the 32GB DIMMs, which are required to achieve the maximum capacity of 768GB RAM, will not be available until Q2 2012 (date not provided at this time.)  To aid with your memory selection, check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.poweredgecpumemory.com/" target="_blank">http://www.poweredgecpumemory.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb.png" alt="image" width="430" height="295" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><strong>LAN on Motherboard Options</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned above, the PowerEdge M620’s on-board network is available in removable card, known as the Select Network Adapter.  While this is new to the M6xx family, it is Dell’s second generation of removal LOM cards.  In fact, with the 12G product launch, the Select Network Adapter can be found in the R620 and R720 rack servers too.  Below is a chart of the 3 card options, as well as the features they support.  <del><span style="color: #ff0000;">In summary, if you want SR-IOV or DCB Support, you’ll want to go with the Intel X520 card – otherwise it’s a battle between Broadcom and QLogic.</span></del><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>REVISED 3/7/12</strong>  &#8211; I clearly was under the influence of lack of sleep when I wrote this.  The matrix was all messed up.  Here is the CORRECT list of supported options:</span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Dell-Select-Network-Adapter-Matrix-Blade-Servers.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1733" title="Dell Select Network Adapter Matrix - Blade Servers" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Dell-Select-Network-Adapter-Matrix-Blade-Servers.jpg" alt="Dell Select Network Adapter Matrix - Blade Servers" width="682" height="162" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Other New Options</strong></p>
<p>The PowerEdge M620 comes with 2 x mezzanine I/O card expansion slots <strong>(x8 PCIe 3.0</strong>) fully available in both the 1 CPU and 2 CPU blade server designs.  I was planning on listing the options available for the mezzanine slots on the M620, but the list is too long, however you can find it on the M620 page at <a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd?~ck=anav">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd?~ck=anav</a>.  Instead, I want to touch on a couple of other cool features that you might find valuable.</p>
<p>Dual embedded SD slots for Hypervisor – since the market is heading toward encouraging embedded hypervisors, Dell decided to place dual card slots into the M620 designed to be redundant.  If you lose your primary SD card, the secondary slot is available to resume the workload.</p>
<p>Now, for my final trick – SCAN THIS QR Tag:</p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image2.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb2.png" alt="image" width="218" height="197" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Welcome to the future.  No longer will you have to search for assistance with a server product.  With the 12th Generation of the Dell PowerEdge servers, Dell is introducing the concept of using QR tags to offer technical assistance in the form of step-by-step videos, reference materials and even help with looking up your service tag.</p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image3.png"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb3.png" alt="image" width="164" height="244" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more information on the Dell PowerEdge M620, download the the full  <a title="PowerEdge M620 Technical Guide" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/d/shared-content~data-sheets~en/Documents~dell-poweredge-m620-technical-guide.pdf.aspx?layoutvariation=modal&amp;modaltype=box&amp;position=center&amp;modalwidth=600&amp;modalheight=600&amp;modalscroll=yes&amp;ovrcolor=#000000&amp;ovropac=50&amp;modaltarget=div">PowerEdge M620 Technical Guide</a> or visit <a title="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd?~ck=anav" href="http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd">http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m620/pd?~</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #666666;">Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.    Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market.</span></em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/03/dells-poweredge-m620-blade-server-offering-up-to-768gb-ram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Announces New Blade Server &#8211; M620</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/02/dell-announces-new-blade-server-m620/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/02/dell-announces-new-blade-server-m620/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1000e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerEdge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon E5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In anticipation of Intel&#8217;s upcoming E5-2600 CPU (aka Sandy Bridge) announcement, Dell officially announced the 12th Generation of PowerEdge servers today.  Although the specifics of the 12th Generation, or &#8220;12G&#8221;, servers have not yet been released, it is very clear there will be a new blade server added to the Dell PowerEdge portfolio: the M620. While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2012%252F02%252Fdell-announces-new-blade-server-m620%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fyxr23t%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%20Announces%20New%20Blade%20Server%20-%20M620%20%23blade%20server%20%23blade%20servers%20%23Intel%20%23M1000e%20%23M620%20%23PowerEdge%20%23The%20Register%20%23Xeon%20E5%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dell-PowerEdge-12G-M620.jpg" target="_blank"><img class=" wp-image-1689 alignleft" style="margin-top: 8px; margin-bottom: 8px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Dell PowerEdge 12G M620" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dell-PowerEdge-12G-M620-150x150.jpg" alt="Dell PowerEdge 12G M620" width="90" height="90" /></a></p>
<p>In anticipation of Intel&#8217;s upcoming E5-2600 CPU (aka Sandy Bridge) announcement, Dell officially announced the 12th Generation of PowerEdge servers today.  Although the specifics of the 12th Generation, or &#8220;12G&#8221;, servers have not yet been released, it is very clear there will be a new blade server added to the Dell PowerEdge portfolio: the <strong>M620</strong>.</p>
<p>While <a href="http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/corp-comm/power-edge-servers.aspx" target="_blank">Dell.com announcement</a> site does not have a lot of the details of what&#8217;s coming in 12G, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/27/dell_poweredge_12g_server_launch/" target="_blank">The Register</a> has been able to secure some good information on the Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server that I&#8217;ll share with you.</p>
<ol>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">The M620&#8242;s size is &#8220;half-height&#8221;allowing you to put up to 16 inside of the Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">It will hold up to 2 x Intel Xeon E5 CPUs</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">It will hold up to 768GB of RAM (the same as its tower and rack equivalent)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">The M620 has two hot-plug, 2.5-inch drive bays, and can have SSD, SATA disk, or SAS disk drives slid into those two slots. </span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">The PERC S110 controller with software raid and the PERC H310, H710, and H710P controllers for internal RAID arrays can snap onto this M620 blade. </span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">The M620 has <span style="text-decoration: underline;">two</span> SD cards for redundant embedded hypervisors to sit on.</span></li>
</ol>
<p>Of course, there are a few other goodies that The Register didn&#8217;t mention &#8211; so I&#8217;ll hold off talking about until the official Intel announcement.</p>
<p>To read the full article from The Register discussing the next generation of Dell PowerEdge server (including the tower and rack models,) go to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/27/dell_poweredge_12g_server_launch/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/27/dell_poweredge_12g_server_launch/</a></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #666666;">Kevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 15 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.    Kevin works for Dell as a Server Specialist covering the Global 500 East market.</span></em></p>
<div id="attachment_1689" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 292px"><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dell-PowerEdge-12G-M620.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1689" title="Dell PowerEdge 12G M620" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dell-PowerEdge-12G-M620.jpg" alt="Dell PowerEdge 12G M620" width="282" height="313" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo from Dell.com</p></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2012/02/dell-announces-new-blade-server-m620/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q3 2011 IDC Worldwide &#8211; Steady as She Goes</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/12/q3-2011-idc-worldwide-steady-as-she-goes/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/12/q3-2011-idc-worldwide-steady-as-she-goes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fricke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot off the presses is the latest IDC worldwide server market revenue report for Q3 2011. The gist of the report is that while some of the numbers are slightly adjusted, really not much has changed in the blade server market. Revenue growth for the entire server market (all servers, not just blade servers) slowed considerably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2011%252F12%252Fq3-2011-idc-worldwide-steady-as-she-goes%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FrGVqQL%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Q3%202011%20IDC%20Worldwide%20-%20Steady%20as%20She%20Goes%20%23Cisco%20%23Dell%20%23HP%20%23IBM%20%23IDC%20%23market%20share%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Hot off the presses is the latest IDC worldwide server market revenue report for Q3 2011. The gist of the report is that while some of the numbers are slightly adjusted, really not much has changed in the blade server market.</p>
<p>Revenue growth for the entire server market (all servers, not just blade servers) slowed considerably showing only <strong>4.2</strong><strong>% year</strong> <strong>over year</strong> growth bringing in $12.7 billion. Growth in the world of servers continues but this marks the slowest growth rate for any quarter since Q1 2010. IDC believes that overall server sales will continue to decelerate due to weakening economic conditions around the globe. &#8220;After nearly two years of steady revenue growth, the server market began to decelerate in Q3 2011 as demand stabilized for many system categories,&#8221; said Matt Eastwood, group VP and general manager. Incidentally, IBM and HP are both holding steady, tied for the #1 spot in revenue share, at <strong>29.8%</strong>.</p>
<p>When looking at the blade server market specifically, growth was steady for Q3 2011 but not as explosive as Q2 2011. IDC reports &#8220;solid growth&#8221; in the quarter with a revenue <strong>increase of 16.4% year over year</strong> (vs 26.9% growth in 2Q11). Shipments increased 2.4% (vs 6.2% reported growth for 2Q11). One thing that hasn&#8217;t changed since last quarter is that <strong>89% of all blade revenue is driven by x86</strong> systems. Also, blade server sales representing  <strong>20.8% of all x86</strong> server revenue. This shows continued steady growth for the blade server segment but that the pace may be slowing slightly.<img src="../wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>#1 market share:</strong> HP managed to hold the majority margin moving to<strong> 51.0% in Q3 2011</strong> from 51.9% in Q2 2011.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>#2 market share:</strong> IBM continues to see its margin chipped away slightly down to <strong>18.5% in Q3 2011</strong> from 19.1% in Q2 2011.</p>
<p><strong>#3 market share:</strong> Cisco&#8217;s disruptive market penetration seems to have slowed at <strong>10.7%</strong> overall compared to a solid 10% in Q2 2011.</p>
<p><strong>#4 market share:</strong> Even Dell dropped slightly to <strong>7.2%</strong> revenue share from 8.2% last quarter.</p>
<p>In looking at the totals, the top four vendors represented 87.4% of the revenue share in the blade servers market which is actually down 2% from last quarter. Cisco grew revenue share by less than 1% which means that some of the displacement of the remaining top vendors is not accounted for. Does this mean there may be some new players in the &#8220;others&#8221; category that we should be watching? Without a detailed breakdown it&#8217;s hard to tell but I&#8217;ll definitely be looking forward to comparing the numbers next quarter to see if the trend continues. It could, after all, just be a factor of the margin of error in the statistics.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.idc.com/analysts/viewanalystprofile.jsp?containerId=PRF002652&amp;sectionId=null&amp;elementId=null&amp;pageType=SYNOPSIS" target="_blank">Jed Scaramella</a>, research manager, <a href="http://www.idc.com/research/viewfactsheet.jsp?containerId=IDC_P10665&amp;sectionId=null&amp;elementId=null&amp;pageType=SYNOPSIS" target="_blank">Enterprise Servers </a>at IDC, &#8220;Blade systems represented the fastest growing segment in the server industry and now account for 16.0% of total server revenue &#8211; a historic high.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably the most interesting aspect of the report is the introduction of hyper-scale servers. &#8220;Hyper-scale servers are designed for large scale datacenters with streamlined system designs that focus on performance, energy efficiency, and density.&#8221; This sounds like the mantra for blade servers with the main difference being the lack of management and high availability capabilities at the hardware level. Basically these represent the miles of simple, rack mount commodity servers used by the likes of Google and Facebook. This is a $428 million dollar server segment and growing.</p>
<p>For the full IDC report covering the Q2 2011 Worldwide Server Market, please visit IDC’s website at <a href="http://www.idc.com/">http://www.idc.com</a>.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/12/q3-2011-idc-worldwide-steady-as-she-goes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Network Daughter Card (NDC) and Network Partitioning (NPAR) Explained</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/10/dell-network-daughter-card-ndc-and-network-partitioning-npar-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/10/dell-network-daughter-card-ndc-and-network-partitioning-npar-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Daughter Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Partitioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a reader of BladesMadeSimple, you are no stranger to Dell&#8217;s Network Daughter Card (NDC), but if it is a new term for you, let me give you the basics. Up until now, blade servers came with network interface cards (NICs) pre-installed as part of the motherboard.  Most servers came standard with Dual-port [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2011%252F10%252Fdell-network-daughter-card-ndc-and-network-partitioning-npar-explained%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FmZ43V6%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%20Network%20Daughter%20Card%20%28NDC%29%20and%20Network%20Partitioning%20%28NPAR%29%20Explained%20%23blade%20server%20%23blade%20servers%20%23cna%20%23Dell%20%23iSCSI%20%23NDC%20%23Network%20Daughter%20Card%20%23Network%20Partitioning%20%23NPAR%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>If you are a reader of BladesMadeSimple, you are no stranger to Dell&#8217;s Network Daughter Card (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">NDC</span></strong>), but if it is a new term for you, let me give you the basics. Up until now, blade servers came with network interface cards (NICs) pre-installed as part of the motherboard.  Most servers came standard with Dual-port 1Gb Ethernet NICs on the motherboard, so if you invested into a 10Gb Ethernet (10GbE) or other converged technologies, the onboard NICs were stuck at 1Gb Ethernet.  As technology advanced and 10Gb Ethernet became more prevalent in the data center, blade servers entered the market with 10GbE standard on the motherboard.  If, however, you weren’t implementing 10GbE then you found yourself paying for technology that you couldn’t use.  Basically, what ever came standard on the motherboard is what you were stuck with – until now.</p>
<p><span id="more-1561"></span></p>
<p> <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Dell-Network-Daughter-Card-NDC.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Dell Network Daughter Card (NDC)" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Dell-Network-Daughter-Card-NDC_thumb.jpg" alt="Dell Network Daughter Card (NDC)" width="232" height="135" align="left" border="0" /></a>Dell has broken the long-standing design concept of embedding the LAN onto the motherboard (aka LOM) and replaced it with a small, removable mezzanine card called a Network Daughter Card, or NDC.  The NDC provides the buyer with a flexibility of choosing what they want ( 4 x 1GbE, 2 x 10GbE or 2 x Converged Network Adapter.)  This innovation is exciting to me, as it not only provides a possible upgrade path to future technologies, but it also changes the way we look at server technology.  No longer does the on-board NIC have to be integrated onto the motherboard, but it can be a removable card that can be easily replaced or upgraded.  In a few years when this is standard architecture on every x86 server, remember where you saw it first.</p>
<p>But wait – there’s more.  In addition the NDC is the first adapter to offer the industry’s first network partitioning, or “<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">NPAR</span></strong>” scheme that makes it possible to split the 10GbE pipe while working with any of the Dell PowerEdge M1000e 10GbE Ethernet Switch Modules.  So, what’s the big deal about NPAR?  Let me explain.</p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Dell-Network-Partitioning-NPAR-Example.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 16px 0px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Dell Network Partitioning (NPAR) Example" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Dell-Network-Partitioning-NPAR-Example_thumb.jpg" alt="Dell Network Partitioning (NPAR) Example" width="636" height="361" align="left" border="0" /></a>With the increased amount of virtualization in the data center, combined with an increase in data and cloud computing, the network’s efficiency is becoming compromised driving many organizations to embrace a 10GbE network.  While moving to a more robust 10GbE environment may be ideal for an organization, it also brings challenges like ensuring that the appropriate bandwidth for all resources is available in both the physical and virtual environments.  This is where NPAR comes in.  Network Partitioning allows for administrators to split up  the 10GbE pipes on the NDC into 4 separate partitions or physical functions and allocate bandwidth and resources as needed.  Each of the four partitions is an actual PCI Express function that appears in the blade server’s system ROM, O/S or virtual O/S as a separate physical NIC. </p>
<p>Each partition can support networking features such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>TCP checksum offload</li>
<li>Large send offload</li>
<li>Transparent Packet Aggregation (TPA)</li>
<li>Multiqueue receive-side scaling</li>
<li>VM queue (VMQ) feature of the Microsoft® Hyper-V™ hypervisor</li>
<li>Internet SCSI (iSCSI) HBA</li>
<li>Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) HBA.</li>
</ul>
<p>Administrators can enable/disable any of the features per partition and they configure a partition to run iSCSI, FCoE, and TCP/ IP Offload Engine (TOE) simultaneously.</p>
<p>Each of the four partitions per port (8 per NDC) can be set up with a specific size and a specific weight.  In the example shown on the above, you see that Physical Port 1 has 4 partitions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Partition 1 (red) = 2Gbps, running as an iSCSI HBA on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2</li>
<li>Partition 2 (orange) = 2Gbps, running as an FCoE HBA on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2</li>
<li>Partition 3 (green) = 1Gbps, running TOE on on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2</li>
<li>Partition 4 (blue) = 5Gbps, running as a Layer 2 NIC on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2</li>
</ul>
<p>Each partition’s “<strong><span style="color: #004080;">Maximum Bandwidth</span></strong>” can be set to any increment of 100Mbps (or .1Gbps) up to 10000 Mbps or 10 Gbps.  Also, note, this is for send/transmit only.  The receive direction bandwidth is always 10 Gbps.</p>
<p>Furthermore, admins can configure the weighting of each partition to provide increased bandwidth presence when an application requires it.  In the example above, Physical Port 2 has the “<strong><span style="color: #000080;">Relative Bandwidth Weight</span></strong>” on all 4 partitions set for an equal weight at 25% – giving each port equal weight.  If, however VMkernel NIC 1 (red) needed to have more weight, or priority, over the other NICs, we could set the weight to 100% giving that port top priority.</p>
<p>If you are feeling really adventurous, you can <span style="color: #004080;"><strong>oversubscribe</strong></span><span style="color: #000000;"> a port</span>.  This is accomplished by setting the 4 partitions of that single port to having a Maximum Bandwidth setting of more than 100%.  This allows each of the partitions to take as much bandwidth as allowed as their individual traffic flow needs change – based on the Relative Bandwidth Weight assigned.  Take a look at the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/NPAR-Example.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="NPAR Example" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/NPAR-Example_thumb.jpg" alt="NPAR Example" width="489" height="506" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>The example above shows each of the four partitions’ Maximum Bandwidth (shown in .1 increments so 10 = 1 Gbps)</p>
<ul>
<li>Partition 1 = 1 Gbps</li>
<li>Partition 2 = 1 Gbps</li>
<li>Partition 3 = 8 Gbps</li>
<li>Partition 4 = 8 Gpbs</li>
</ul>
<p>Total for all 4 partitions = 18 Gbps, which means the port is 80% (8 Gbps) oversubscribed.</p>
<p>Some additional rules to note from the NPAR User’s Manual:</p>
<ul>
<li>For Microsoft Windows Server, you can have the Ethernet Protocol enabled on all, some, or none of the four partitions on an individual port.</li>
<li>For Linux OSs, the Ethernet protocol will always be enabled (even if disabled in Dell Unified Server Configuration screen).</li>
<li>A maximum of two iSCSI Offload Protocols (HBA) can be enabled over any of the four available partitions of a single port. <strong><span style="color: #9b00d3;"><em>For simplicity, it is recommended to always using the first two partitions of a port for any offload protocols.</em></span></strong></li>
<li>For Microsoft Windows Server , the Ethernet protocol does not have to be enabled for the iSCSI offload protocol to be enabled and used on a specific partition.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on the Network Partitioning capabilities of the Dell Network Daughter Card, check out the white paper at: <a title="Dell Broadcom NPAR White Paper" href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CBoQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dell.com%2Fdownloads%2Fglobal%2Fproducts%2Fpedge%2Fen%2FDell-Broadcom-NPAR-White-Paper.pdf&amp;ei=sdqTTuDyO7DLsQLOoPDRBg&amp;usg=AFQjCNHX7FeAQL4K_9csydaR_mJoSRtC5w&amp;sig2=h5m9gqruXB_K2HSjZLdm3w">Dell Broadcom NPAR White Paper</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;"><em>Kevin Houston is the founder of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 14 plus years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.    Kevin works for Dell as a Server Sales Engineer covering the Global 500 market.</em></span></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/10/dell-network-daughter-card-ndc-and-network-partitioning-npar-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are Dell&#8217;s Blade Servers &#8220;Different&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/why-are-dells-blade-servers-different/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/why-are-dells-blade-servers-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40Gb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Daughter Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Interface Card Partitioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Bradfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve learned over the years that it is very easy to focus on the feeds and speeds of a server while overlooking features that truly differentiate.  When you take a look under the covers, a server&#8217;s CPU and memory are going to be equal to the competition, so the innovation that goes into the server [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2011%252F09%252Fwhy-are-dells-blade-servers-different%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fr4lqrs%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Why%20Are%20Dell%27s%20Blade%20Servers%20%5C%22Different%5C%22%3F%20%2340Gb%20%23blade%20server%20%23blade%20servers%20%23cna%20%23Dell%20%23NDC%20%23Network%20Daughter%20Card%20%23Network%20Interface%20Card%20Partitioning%20%23NPAR%20%23Rob%20Bradfield%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned over the years that it is very easy to focus on the feeds and speeds of a server while overlooking features that truly differentiate.  When you take a look under the covers, a server&#8217;s CPU and memory are going to be equal to the competition, so the innovation that goes into the server is where the focus should be.  On Dell&#8217;s community blog, Rob Bradfield, a Senior Blade Server Product Line Consultant in Dell’s Enterprise Product Group, discusses some of the innovation and reliability that goes into Dell blade servers.  I encourage you to take a look at Rob&#8217;s blog post at <a href="http://dell.to/mXE7iJ">http://dell.to/mXE7iJ</a>.<span id="more-1554"></span></p>
<p>I also want to highlight some other innovations that Dell is offering on certain blade servers:</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Network Daughter Card (NDC)</strong></span> &#8211; unlike the network interface cards built into the blade server motherboard, the NDC is a daughter card that offers choices of 4 x 1Gb NICs, 10Gb NICs or CNA.  The NDC is a new feature and not offered on every blade server, but for more info, check out this earlier blog post I wrote: <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/05/a-review-of-the-dell-poweredge-m710-hd-blade-server/">http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/05/a-review-of-the-dell-poweredge-m710-hd-blade-server/</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Network Interface Card Partitioning  (NPAR)</strong></span> &#8211; this is a feature found on certain blade server models that allows you to divide up the onboard 10Gb NICs into &#8220;virtual NICs&#8221;.  The cool thing is this can be performed without a specific network I/O module so you don&#8217;t have to worry about being locked into any specific I/O module and without the use of any CPU overhead or specialized software.   Read more about this at <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/04/dellapril5announcements/">http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/04/dellapril5announcements/</a>.</p>
<p>Let me put these innovative features into a real life scenario (<em>note &#8211; this is simply an example and doesn&#8217;t confirm or deny any future product release from Dell.) </em> Imagine today you invest into a blade server with a 10Gb NDC using NPAR to split up the 10Gb pipe into smaller 1Gb virtual NICs. and 10Gb capable Ethernet I/O Module and in 18 months, a 40Gb Ethernet Switch module comes out.  You could theoretically replace the NDC and the Ethernet module with the 40Gb flavor (if/when it ever is available)</p>
<p>The next time you choose a server, look beyond the speeds and feeds and look at the innovation, the reliability and the value the server can offer.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;"><em>Kevin Houston is the founder of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 14 plus years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.    Kevin works for Dell as a Server Sales Engineer covering the Global 500 market.</em></span></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/why-are-dells-blade-servers-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customer Success Story with Dell, Citrix and VMware</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/customer-success-story-with-dell-citrix-and-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/customer-success-story-with-dell-citrix-and-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brickworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Austrialian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always find it interesting to hear how customers are using blade server technology &#8220;in the real world.&#8221;   Brickworks, a $1.7 billion Australian brick company with over 60 locations and 1,000 employees, recently provided The Australian with details about how Citrix XenApp Enterprise combined with VMware vSphere and Dell rack and blade servers helped develop a more efficient workplace for its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2011%252F09%252Fcustomer-success-story-with-dell-citrix-and-vmware%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fp1JqRP%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Customer%20Success%20Story%20with%20Dell%2C%20Citrix%20and%20VMware%20%23blade%20servers%20%23Brickworks%20%23Citrix%20%23The%20Austrialian%20%23VMware%20%23vSphere%20%23XenApp%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>I always find it interesting to hear how customers are using blade server technology &#8220;in the real world.&#8221;   <a href="http://www.brickworks.com.au/" target="_blank">Brickworks</a>, a $1.7 billion Australian brick company with over 60 locations and 1,000 employees, recently provided <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/brickworks-builds-solid-system-using-citrix/story-e6frgakx-1226129943367" target="_blank">The Australian</a> with details about how Citrix XenApp Enterprise combined with VMware vSphere and Dell rack and blade servers helped develop a more efficient workplace for its employees.  <span id="more-1547"></span>Read the full article at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/brickworks-builds-solid-system-using-citrix/story-e6frgakx-1226129943367">http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/brickworks-builds-solid-system-using-citrix/story-e6frgakx-1226129943367</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Kevin Houston is the founder of BladesMadeSimple.com.  He has over 14 plus years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.    Kevin works for Dell as a Server Sales Engineer covering the Global 500 market.  </em></p>
<p><em>#IWorkForDell<strong><br />
</strong></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/09/customer-success-story-with-dell-citrix-and-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

