<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blades Made Simple &#187; B200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/tag/b200/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Takes Top 8 Core VMware VMmark Server Position</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/cisco-takes-top-8-core-vmware-vmmark-server-position/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/cisco-takes-top-8-core-vmware-vmmark-server-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BL490]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco is getting some (more) recognition with their UCS blade server product, as they recently achieved the top position for &#8220;8 Core Server&#8221; on VMware&#8217;s VMmark benchmark tool.  VMmark is the industry&#8217;s first (and only credible) virtualization benchmark for x86-based computers.  According to the VMmark website, the Cisco UCS B200 blade server reached a score of 25.06 @ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbladesmadesimple.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fcisco-takes-top-8-core-vmware-vmmark-server-position%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbladesmadesimple.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fcisco-takes-top-8-core-vmware-vmmark-server-position%2F&amp;source=Kevin_Houston&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Cisco is getting some (more) recognition with their UCS blade server product, as they recently achieved the top position for &#8220;8 Core Server&#8221; on <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html" target="_blank">VMware&#8217;s VMmark</a> benchmark tool.  VMmark is the industry&#8217;s first (and only credible) virtualization benchmark for x86-based computers.  According to the VMmark website, the Cisco <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10280/index.html" target="_blank">UCS B200</a></strong></span> blade server reached a score of <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">25.06</span></strong> @ 17 tiles.  A &#8220;tile&#8221; is simple a collection of virtual machines (VM&#8217;s) that are executing a set of diverse workloads designed to represent a natural work environment.   The total number of tiles that a server can handle provides a detailed measurement of that server&#8217;s consolidation capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Cisco&#8217;s Winning Configuration<br />
</strong>So &#8211; how did Cisco reach the top server spot?  Here&#8217;s the configuration:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>server config:</em></span></p>
<ul>
<li>2 x Intel Xeon X5570 Processors</li>
<li>96GB of RAM (16 x 8GB)</li>
<li>1 x Converged Network Adapter (Cisco UCS M71KR-Q)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">storage config:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>EMC</strong> </span>CX4-240</li>
<li>Cisco MDS 9130</li>
<li>1154.27GB Used Disk Space</li>
<li>1024MB Array Cache</li>
<li>41 disks used on 4 enclosures/shelves (1 with 14 disk, 3 with 9 disks)</li>
<li>37 LUNs used<br />
*17 at 38GB (file server + mail server) over 20 x 73GB SSDs<br />
*17 at 15GB (database) + 2 LUNs at 400GB (Misc) over 16 x 450GB 15k disks<br />
* 1 LUN at 20GB (boot) over 5 x 300GB 15k disks</li>
<li>RAID 0 for VMs, RAID 5 for VMware ESX 4.0 O/S</li>
</ul>
<p>While first place on the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html" target="_blank">VMmark page (8 cores)</a> shows Fujitsu&#8217;s RX300, it&#8217;s important to note that it was reached using Intel&#8217;s W5590 processor &#8211; a processor that is designed for &#8220;workstations&#8221; &#8211; not servers.  Second place, of server processors, currently shows HP&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF25a/3709945-3709945-3328410-241641-3328419-3884113.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">BL490</span> </a></strong>with <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">24.54</span></strong> (@ 17 tiles)</p>
<p><em>Thanks to Omar Sultan (@omarsultan) for Tweeting about this and to Harris Sussman for </em><a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/vmwaresvmmark_benchmark_position_1_for_ucs_on_intel_xeon_processor_for_8_co/" target="_blank"><em>blogging </em></a><em>about it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/02/cisco-takes-top-8-core-vmware-vmmark-server-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
