<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blades Made Simple™ &#187; Fabric Interconnects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/tag/fabric-interconnects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco&#039;s New Virtualized Adapter (aka &quot;Palo&quot;)</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/ciscos-new-virtualized-adapter-aka-palo/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/ciscos-new-virtualized-adapter-aka-palo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabric Extenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabric Interconnects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCS Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualized adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously known as &#8220;Palo&#8221;, Cisco&#8217;s virtualized adapter allows for a server to split up the 10Gb pipes into numerous virtual pipes (see below) like multiple NICs or multiple Fibre Channel HBAs.  Although the card shown in the image to the left is a normal PCIe card, the initial launch of the card will be in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2009%252F10%252Fciscos-new-virtualized-adapter-aka-palo%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cisco%26%23039%3Bs%20New%20Virtualized%20Adapter%20%28aka%20%26quot%3BPalo%26quot%3B%29%20%23blade%20server%20%23Cisco%20%23database%20servers%20%23Fabric%20Extenders%20%23Fabric%20Interconnects%20%23FEX%20%23palo%20%23UCS%20%23UCS%20Manager%20%23virtualized%20adapter%20%23VMware%20VDI%20%23VN-Link%20%23web%20server%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Previously known as &#8220;Palo&#8221;, Cisco&#8217;s <strong>virtualized adapter</strong> allows for a server to split up the 10Gb pipes into numerous virtual pipes (see below<a rel="attachment wp-att-121" href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/ciscos-new-virtualized-adapter-aka-palo/palo-adapter/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-121" title="palo adapter" src="http://kevinbladeguy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/palo-adapter.jpg" alt="palo adapter" width="272" height="351" /></a>) like multiple NICs or multiple Fibre Channel HBAs.  Although the card shown in the image to the left is a normal PCIe card, the initial launch of the card will be in the Cisco UCS blade server. </p>
<p><strong>So, What&#8217;s the Big Deal?</strong></p>
<p>When you look at server workloads, their needs vary &#8211; web servers need a pair of NICs, whereas database servers may need 4+ NICs and 2+HBAs.  By having the ability to split the 10Gb pipe into virtual devices, you can set up profiles inside of Cisco&#8217;s UCS Manager to apply the profiles for a specific servers&#8217; needs.  An example of this would be a server being used for VMware VDI (6 NICs and 2 HBAs) during the day, and at night, it&#8217;s repurposed for a computational server needing only 4 NICs.</p>
<p>Another thing to note is although the image shows 128 virtual devices, that is only the <strong>theoretical</strong> limitation.  The reality is that the # of virtual devices <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>depends on the # of connections to the Fabric </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Interconnects</strong><span style="color: #000000;">.  As I previously posted, the servers&#8217; chassis has a pair of  4 port <strong>Fabric Extenders (aka FEX</strong>) that uplink to the UCS 6100 Fabric Interconnect.  If only 1 of the 4 ports is uplinked to the UCS 6100, then <span style="text-decoration: underline;">only</span> <strong>13</strong> virtual devices will be available.  If 2 FEX ports are uplinked, then <strong>28</strong> virtual devices will be available.  If 4 FEX uplink ports are used, then <strong>58</strong> virtual devices will be available.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">Will the ability to carve up your 10Gb pipes into smaller ones make a difference?  It&#8217;s hard to tell.  I guess we&#8217;ll see when this card starts to ship in December of 2009.</span></span></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/ciscos-new-virtualized-adapter-aka-palo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

