<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blades Made Simple™ &#187; Fujitsu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/tag/fujitsu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu Teams up with NetApp to Design a Storage Blade</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/11/fujitsu-teams-up-with-netapp-to-design-a-storage-blade/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/11/fujitsu-teams-up-with-netapp-to-design-a-storage-blade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data ONTAP-vTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRIMERGY SX940 S1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRIMERGY SX960 S1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage blade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2010%252F11%252Ffujitsu-teams-up-with-netapp-to-design-a-storage-blade%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FhmL8Hd%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Fujitsu%20Teams%20up%20with%20NetApp%20to%20Design%20a%20Storage%20Blade%20%23blade%20server%20%23Data%20ONTAP-vTM%20%23Fujitsu%20%23NetApp%20%23PRIMERGY%20SX940%20S1%20%23PRIMERGY%20SX960%20S1%20%23storage%20blade%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Continuing with my theme from yesterday of &#8220;purpose-built&#8221; blade servers, today we take a quick look at a new offering from Fujitsu.&nbsp; Now, as you may have noticed, my site has traditionally been focused on blade servers from Cisco, Dell, HP and IBM but this offering from Fujitsu is so interesting, I figured I would write something up.<img title="More..." src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />Titled under the <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PRIMERGY SX</span></strong> label, Fujitsu&#8217;s storage blades combines Data ONTAP-vTM software from NetApp, blade hardware and an unknown hypervisor to create a &#8220;fully integrated virtual storage appliance.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp; The storage solution supports iSCSI, CIFS and NFS protocol and is based on Data ONTAP-vTM features such as SnapShot, FlexVol, SnapRestore and FilerView.</p>
<p>The storage blades come in two flavors:</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PRIMERGY SX960 S1</span></strong> &#8211; a storge blade that can hold up to <strong>10</strong> additional hot-plug SAS or SATA HDD/SSD.&nbsp; These drives offer high capacity with up to 5 TB SATA HDDs, 3 TB with top-quality 2.5- inch SAS drives and up to 640 GB with power-saving 2.5-inch SATA SSDs.&nbsp; The only catch is that you can only fit 2 of these storage blades into a single chassis.<a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Fujitsu-PRIMERGY-SX960-S1.jpg"><img title="Fujitsu PRIMERGY SX960 S1" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Fujitsu-PRIMERGY-SX960-S1.jpg" alt="Fujitsu PRIMERGY SX960 S1" width="84" height="120" /></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">PRIMERGY SX940 S1</span></strong> -a storge blade that can hold up to <strong>4 </strong>additional hot-plug SAS or SATA HDD/SSD.&nbsp; These drives offer high capacity of up to 584 GB with high quality SAS drives, up to 2 TB with SATA HDDs<a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Fujitsu-PRIMERGY-SX940-S1.jpg"><img title="Fujitsu PRIMERGY SX940 S1" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Fujitsu-PRIMERGY-SX940-S1.jpg" alt="Fujitsu PRIMERGY SX940 S1" width="72" height="120" /></a>.</p>
<p>I understand that Fujitsu is nearly non-existent in North America, but overseas they are well-known.&nbsp; As well, the purpose of this post&nbsp;to showcase that Fujitsu is putting NetApp&#8217;s software expertise onto a blade footprint to be used as a single purpose &#8211; to create a virtual storage array.&nbsp; As blade servers become more more mainstream, I expect to see more vendors team up to offer these types of integrated solutions.</p>
<p>For more information on Fujitsu&#8217;s servers, please visit:<br />
<a href="http://ts.fujitsu.com/products/standard_servers/blade/bx400/storageblades.html">http://ts.fujitsu.com/products/standard_servers/blade/bx400/storageblades.html</a></p>
<p>A special thanks to <a title="Send email to the author" href="http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2010/11/25/netapp_virtual_storage_appliance/">Chris Mellor</a>&nbsp;for his write-up on this Fujitsu offering as seen on <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/25/netapp_virtual_storage_appliance/" target="_blank">theregister.co.uk</a>. <a href="http://mbaromantic.ru/">Сайт знакомств</a></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/11/fujitsu-teams-up-with-netapp-to-design-a-storage-blade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting HP Server Facts (from IDC)</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/01/interesting-hp-server-facts-from-idc/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/01/interesting-hp-server-facts-from-idc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP DL380]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can see from my blog title, I try to focus on &#8220;all things blade servers&#8221;, however I came across this bit of information that I thought would be fun to blog.  An upfront warning &#8211; this is an HP biased blog post, so sorry for those of you who are Cisco, Dell or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2010%252F01%252Finteresting-hp-server-facts-from-idc%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Interesting%20HP%20Server%20Facts%20%28from%20IDC%29%20%23blade%20server%20%23Cisco%20%23Dell%20%23Fujitsu%20%23HP%20%23HP%20DL380%20%23IBM%20%23IDC%20%23Sun%20%23Worldwide%20Quarterly%20Server%20Tracker%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>As you can see from my blog title, I try to focus on &#8220;all things blade servers&#8221;, however I came across this bit of information that I thought would be fun to blog.  An upfront warning &#8211; this is an HP biased blog post, so sorry for those of you who are Cisco, Dell or IBM fans.</p>
<p>Market research firm, <a href="http://www.idc.com/about/about.jsp" target="_blank">IDC</a> released a quarterly update to their <a href="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?pid=23571113&amp;containerId=prUS22100809" target="_blank"><strong>Worldwide Quarterly Server</strong> <strong>Tracker</strong></a>, citing market share figures for the 3rd calendar quarter of 2009 (3Q09).  From this report, there are a few fun HP server facts (thanks to HP for passing these facts along to me:)</p>
<p><span style="color: #339966;"><strong>HP is the #1 vendor in worldwide server shipments for the 30th consecutive quarter (<span style="text-decoration: underline;">7.5 years)</span>. HP shipped more than 1 out of every 3 servers worldwide and captured 36.5 percent total unit shipment share.</strong> </span></p>
<p>According to IDC:</p>
<ul>
<li>HP shipped over 161,000 more servers than #2 Dell.</li>
<li>HP shipped 2.6 times as many servers as #3 IBM</li>
<li>9.0 times as #4 Fujitsu</li>
<li>12.9 times as many as #5 Sun.</li>
<li>HP ended up in a statistical tie with IBM for #1 in <strong>total</strong> server revenue market share with 30.9 percent.  This includes all server (UNIX and x86 revenues.)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #339966;">HP leads the blade server market, with a 50.7 percent <span style="text-decoration: underline;">revenue</span> share, and a 47.7 percent <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unit share</span>.</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Q3_2009_Blades.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-157" title="Q3_2009_Blades" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Q3_2009_Blades-300x206.jpg" alt="" width="169" height="106" /></a>I blogged about this in early December (see this <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/12/idc-q3-2009-report-blade-servers-are-growing-hp-leads-in-shares/" target="_blank">link</a> for details),<a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Q3_2009_Blades.jpg"></a>but it&#8217;s no surprise that HP is leading the pack in blade sales.  Their field sales team is actively promoting blades for nearly every server opportunity and they continue to make innovative additions to their blades (like 10Gb NICs standard on G6 blades.)   HP Integrity blades claimed the #1 position in revenue share for the <strong>RISC+EPIC</strong> blade segment with a 53.2 percent share gaining 1.8 points year over year.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #339966;">For the 53rd consecutive quarter, more than 13 years, HP ProLiant is the x86 server market share leader in both factory revenue and units, shipping more than 1 out of every 3 servers in this market with a 36.9 percent unit share.</span></strong></p>
<p> HP’s x86 revenue share was 14.6 points higher than its nearest competitor; Dell. HP’s x86 revenue share was 19.2 percentage points higher than IBM.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #339966;"> For the 3 major operating environments UNIX®, Windows and Linux combined (representing 99.3 percent of all servers shipped worldwide), HP is number 1 worldwide in server unit shipment and revenue market share.</span></strong></p>
<p>HP holds a 36.5 percent unit market share worldwide, which is 2.6 times more than IBM’s unit market share and 12.9 times the unit share of Sun.</p>
<p>HP holds a 35.4 percent revenue market share worldwide which is 2.2 times the revenue share of Dell and 4.0 times the revenue share of Sun.</p>
<p><em>FINAL NOTE:  All of the following market share figures are for the 3rd quarter (unless otherwise noted) and represent worldwide results as reported by the IDC Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker for Q309, December 2009.</em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/01/interesting-hp-server-facts-from-idc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

