<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blades Made Simple™ &#187; virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/tag/virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com</link>
	<description>Making blade servers simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dell FlexMem Bridge Helps Save 50% on Virtualization Licensing</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/dell-flexmem-bridge-helps-save-50-on-virtualization-licensing/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/dell-flexmem-bridge-helps-save-50-on-virtualization-licensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlexMem Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Xeon 7500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Path Interconnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scalable Memory Interconnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s face it.  Virtualization is everywhere.   Odds are there is something virtualized in your data center.  If not, it soon will be.  As more workloads become virtualized, chances are you are going to run out of &#8220;capacity&#8221; on your virtualization host.  When a host&#8217;s capacity is exhausted, 99% of the time it is because the host [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2010%252F05%252Fdell-flexmem-bridge-helps-save-50-on-virtualization-licensing%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Dell%20FlexMem%20Bridge%20Helps%20Save%2050%25%20on%20Virtualization%20Licensing%20%23blade%20server%20%23Dell%20%23FlexMem%20Bridge%20%23Intel%20Xeon%207500%20%23QPI%20%23Quick%20Path%20Interconnect%20%23Scalable%20Memory%20Interconnect%20%23SMI%20%23virtualization%20%23VMware%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it.  Virtualization is everywhere.  </p>
<p>Odds are there is <em>something</em> virtualized in your data center.  If not, it soon will be.  As more workloads become virtualized, chances are you are going to run out of &#8220;capacity&#8221; on your virtualization host.  <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dell-FlexMem-Value-1.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-561" title="Dell - FlexMem Value (1)" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dell-FlexMem-Value-1.png" alt="" width="346" height="115" /></a>When a host&#8217;s capacity is exhausted, 99% of the time it is because the host ran out of memory, not CPU.  <span id="more-554"></span>Typically you would have to add another ESX host server when you run out of capacity.  When you do this, you are adding more hardware cost AND more virtualization licensing costs.  But what if you could simply add memory when you need it<em> </em>instead of buying more hardware.  Now you can with Dell&#8217;s FlexMem Bridge.</p>
<p><strong>Background<br />
</strong>You may recall that I mentioned the FlexMem Bridge technology in a previous post, but I don&#8217;t think I did it justice.  Before I describe what the FlexMem Bridge technology, let me provide some background.  With the Intel Xeon 7500 CPU (and in fact with all Intel Nehalem architectures), the memory is controlled by a memory controller located on the CPU.  Therefore you have to have a CPU in place to access the associated memory DIMMs&#8230;up until now.  Dell&#8217;s innovative approach removed the necessity to have a CPU in order to access the memory.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Introducing  Dell FlexMem Bridge<br />
</strong>Dell&#8217;s <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">FlexMem Bridge</span></strong> sits in CPU sockets #3 and #4 and connects a memory controller from CPU 1 to the memory DIMMs associated to CPU socket #3 and CPU 2 to the memory associated to CPU Socket #4.  </p>
<p>The FlexMem Bridge does two things:</p>
<ol>
<li>It extends the Scalable Memory Interconnects (SMI) from CPU 1 and CPU 2 to the memory subsystem of CPU 3 and CPU 4.</li>
<li>It reroutes and terminates the 2nd Quick Path Interconnect (QPI) inter-processor communications links to provide optimal performance which would otherwise be disconnected in a 2 CPU configuration.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: center;">Sometimes it&#8217;s easier to view pictures than read descriptions, so take a look at the picture below for a diagram on how this works.<a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/FlexMem-Bridge-rev.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-568 aligncenter" title="FlexMem Bridge (rev)" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/FlexMem-Bridge-rev.png" alt="" width="403" height="225" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/FlexMem-Bridge.jpg"></a></p>
<p><em>(A special thanks to Mike Roberts from Dell for assistance with the above info.)</em></p>
<p><strong>Saving 50% on Virtualization Licensing<br />
</strong>So how does this technology from Dell help you save money on virtualization licenses?  Simple - with Dell&#8217;s FlexMem Bridge technology, you only have to add memory, not more servers, when you need more capacity for VMs.  <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dell-FlexMem-Value-2.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-563 alignleft" title="Dell - FlexMem Value (2)" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dell-FlexMem-Value-2.png" alt="" width="346" height="148" /></a>When you add only memory, you&#8217;re not increasing your CPU count, therefore your virtualization licensing stays the same.  No more buying extra servers just for the memory and no more buying more virtualization licenses.  In the future, if you find you have run out of CPU resources for your VM&#8217;s, you can remove the FlexMem bridges and replace with CPUs (<em>for models with the Intel Xeon 7500 CPU only</em>.) </p>
<p>Dell FlexMem Bridge is available in the Dell PowerEdge 11G R810, R910 and M910 servers running the Intel Xeon 7500 and 6500 CPUs.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/05/dell-flexmem-bridge-helps-save-50-on-virtualization-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing IBM eX5 Portfolio and the HX5 Blade Server</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/03/announcing-ibm-ex5-portfolio-and-the-hx5-blade-server/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/03/announcing-ibm-ex5-portfolio-and-the-hx5-blade-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise x-Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eX5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eXFlash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlexNode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HX5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem EX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x3690]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x3690 X5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: 3/2/2010 at 12:58 PM EST Author&#8217;s Note: I&#8217;m stretching outside of my &#8220;blades&#8221; theme today so I can capture the entire eX5 messaging.   Finally, all the hype is over.  IBM announced today the next evolution of their &#8220;Enterprise x-Architecture&#8221;, also known as eX5.   Why eX5?  Simple:  e=Enterprise X=x-Architecture  5=fifth generation.  IBM&#8217;s Enterprise x-Architecture has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2010%252F03%252Fannouncing-ibm-ex5-portfolio-and-the-hx5-blade-server%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Announcing%20IBM%20eX5%20Portfolio%20and%20the%20HX5%20Blade%20Server%20%23blade%20server%20%23Enterprise%20x-Architecture%20%23eX5%20%23eXFlash%20%23FlexNode%20%23HX5%20%23IBM%20%23Intel%20Nehalem%20EX%20%23max5%20%23virtualization%20%23VMware%20%23x3690%20%23x3690%20X5%22%20%7D);"></div>
<div><em><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/eX5_family.jpg"></a><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-345" title="eX5_family" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/eX5_family-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="120" /></em></div>
<div>
<div><em><span style="color: #ff0000;">UPDATED: 3/2/2010 at 12:58 PM EST</span></em></div>
<div><em>Author&#8217;s Note: I&#8217;m stretching outside of my &#8220;blades&#8221; theme today so I can capture the entire eX5 messaging.<br />
</em><em> </em></div>
<div>Finally, all the hype is over.  IBM <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/29570.wss" target="_blank">announced today</a> the next evolution of their &#8220;Enterprise x-Architecture&#8221;, also known as <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>eX5</strong><span style="color: #000000;">.   </span></span></div>
<div><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Why eX5?</strong>  Simple:  </span></span><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">e</span></strong>=Enterprise <em><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">X</span></strong>=</em>x-Architecture<em>  </em><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">5</span></strong>=fifth generation. </div>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">IBM&#8217;s Enterprise x-Architecture has been around for quite a while providing unique Scalability, Reliability and Flexibility in the x86 4-socket platforms.  You can check out the details of the eX4 technology <a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/redbooks/community/display/REDP4480/IBM+Enterprise+X+Architecture+-+eX4+and+eX5" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span> </p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">Today&#8217;s announcement offered up a few facts:</span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span></span></span> </p>
<p>a) the existing x3850 and x3950 M2 will be called x3850 and x3950<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> X5</strong><span style="color: #000000;"> signifying a trend for IBM to move toward product naming designations that reflect the purpose of the server.</span></span> </p>
<p>b) the x3850 and x3950 X5&#8242;s will use the Intel Nehalem EX - to be officially announced/released on March 30.  At this time we can expect full details including part numbers, pricing and technical specifications. </p>
<div class="mceTemp"> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">c) a new 2u high,  2 socket server, the <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>x3690 X5</strong></span> was also announced.  This is probably the most exciting of the product announcements, as it is based on the Intel Nehalem EX processor but IBM&#8217;s innovation is going to enable the x3690 X5 to scale from 2 sockets to 4 sockets &#8211; <em>but wait, there&#8217;s more</em>.  There will be the ability, called <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">MAX5</span></strong> to add a <strong>memory expansion unit</strong>  to the x3690 X5 systems, enabling their system memory to be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">DOUBLED</span>.</span></span></span></span>d) in addition to the memory drawer, IBM will be shipping <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">packs of solid state disks, called</span><strong> eXFlash</strong></span> that will deliver <strong>high performance</strong> to replace the limited IOPs of traditional spinning disks.  IBM is touting &#8220;significant&#8221; increases in performance for local databases with this new bundle of solid state disks.   In fact, according to IBM&#8217;s <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/29570.wss" target="_blank">press release</a>, eXFlash technology would eliminate the need for a client to purchase two entry-level servers and 80 JBODs to support a 240,000 IOPs database environment, saving $670,000 in server and storage acquisition costs.   The cool part is, these packs of disks will pop into the hot-swap drive bays of the x3690, x3850 and x3950 X5 servers.</div>
<p>e) IBM also announced a new technology, known as &#8220;<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">FlexNode</span></strong>&#8221; that offers up <span style="text-decoration: underline;">physical</span> partitioning capability for servers to move from being a single system to 2 different unique systems and back again. </p>
<div><strong> </strong></div>
<div><strong>Blade Specific News</strong></div>
<div><strong>1) IBM will be releasing a new blade server, the <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>BladeCenter</strong> </span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">HX5</span> </strong>next quarter that will also use the Intel Xeon 7500.  This blade server will scale, like all of the eX5 products, from 2 processors to 4 processors (and theoretically more) and will be ideal for database workloads.  Again, pricing and specs for this product will be released on the official Intel Nehalem EX launch date.  </strong></div>
<div><strong> </strong></div>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>  </p>
<div id="attachment_344" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 95px"><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/hx5-front.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-344  " title="hx5 - front" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/hx5-front-173x300.jpg" alt="" width="85" height="128" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">IBM BladeCenter HX5 Blade Server</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p>An observation from the pictures of the HX5 is that it will not have hot-swap drives, like the HS22&#8242;s do.  This means there will be internal drives &#8211; most like solid state drives (SSDs).  You may recall from my previous rumour post that the lack of hot-swap drives is pretty evident &#8211; IBM needed the real estate for the memory.  Unfortunately until memristors become available, blade vendors will need to sacrifice real estate for memory. </p>
<p>2) As part of the MAX5 technology, IBM will also be launching a memory blade to increase the overall memory on the HX5 blade server.  Expect more details on this in the near future. </p>
<p>Visit IBM&#8217;s website for their Live eX5 Event at 2 p.m. Eastern time at this site: </p>
<p><a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/info/x86servers/ex5/events/index.html?CA=ex5launchteaser&amp;ME=m&amp;MET=exli&amp;RE=ezvrm&amp;Tactic=us0ab06w&amp;cm_mmc=us0ab06w-_-m-_-ezvrm-_-ex5launchteaser-20100203">http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/info/x86servers/ex5/events/index.html?CA=ex5launchteaser&amp;ME=m&amp;MET=exli&amp;RE=ezvrm&amp;Tactic=us0ab06w&amp;cm_mmc=us0ab06w-_-m-_-ezvrm-_-ex5launchteaser-20100203</a> </p>
<p>As more information comes out on the new IBM eX5 portfolio, check back here and I&#8217;ll keep you posted.  I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. </p>
<div id="attachment_346" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/MAX5.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-346" title="MAX5" src="http://bladesmadesimple.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/MAX5-300x154.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="154" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MAX5 Memory Drawer (1U)</p></div>
<p> </p>
<div class="mceTemp">I find the x3690 X5 to be so interesting and exciting because it could quickly take over the server space that is currently occupied by the HP DL380 and the IBM x3650&#8242;s when it comes to virtualization.  We all know that VMware and other hypervisors thrive on memory, however the current 2 socket server design is limited to 12 &#8211; 16 memory sockets.  With the <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">IB</span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">M</span> System x3690 X5</span></strong>, this limitation can be overcome, as you can simply add on a memory drawer to achieve more memory capacity. </div>
<div class="mceTemp"><strong>Industry Opinions</strong></div>
<div class="mceTemp">Check out this analyst&#8217;s view of the IBM eX5 announcement <a href="ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/xsw03069usen/XSW03069USEN.PDF" target="_blank">here</a> (pdf).</div>
<div class="mceTemp">Here&#8217;s what VMware&#8217;s CTO, Stephen Herrod, has to say about IBM eX5:</div>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XDlIsVM3Rjg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XDlIsVM3Rjg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"> </embed></object> </p>
<p></strong></p>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2010/03/announcing-ibm-ex5-portfolio-and-the-hx5-blade-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Dell Blade Server Page &#8211; &#8220;Dell TechCenter Wiki&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/12/great-dell-blade-server-page-dell-techcenter-wiki/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/12/great-dell-blade-server-page-dell-techcenter-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell TechCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bladesmadesimple.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking through my previous posts it would appear that I&#8217;m against Dell&#8217;s blade server.  That&#8217;s not the case.  The reality is that it is hard to find good technical info on Dell&#8217;s product &#8211; that is until recently.  A search on SwagBucks.com led me to a little-known Dell website, called &#8220;Dell TechCenter Wiki&#8220;.  The site, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2009%252F12%252Fgreat-dell-blade-server-page-dell-techcenter-wiki%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Great%20Dell%20Blade%20Server%20Page%20-%20%5C%22Dell%20TechCenter%20Wiki%5C%22%20%23blade%20server%20%23Dell%20%23Dell%20TechCenter%20%23servers%20%23storage%20%23virtualization%20%23wiki%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Looking through my previous posts it would appear that I&#8217;m against Dell&#8217;s blade server.  That&#8217;s not the case.  The reality is that it is hard to find good technical info on Dell&#8217;s product &#8211; that is until recently.  A search on <a href="http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/TheBladeRunner" target="_blank">SwagBucks.com</a> led me to a little-known Dell website, called &#8220;<strong><a href="http://www.delltechcenter.com/" target="_blank">Dell TechCenter Wiki</a></strong>&#8220;. </p>
<p>The site, located at <a href="http://www.delltechcenter.com/">http://www.delltechcenter.com/</a>, is a Dell sponsored wiki where you can find technical info on servers, storage, and even virtualization.  The wiki also provides recorded demos, white papers and even weekly chats with Dell experts to get your hard-to-answer questions answered.  Last week&#8217;s chat offered  an overview of new features available with the Dell Chassis Management Controller (CMC) for remote monitoring and access of system component information and status of Dell PowerEdge™ M1000e modular blade enclosures. </p>
<p>As you can tell, this information can be extremely valueable to an IT professional with Dell blade servers, so I encourage you to check it out and let me know what you think.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/12/great-dell-blade-server-page-dell-techcenter-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#039;s Well Hidden Secret Blade Server</title>
		<link>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/hps-well-hidden-secret-blade-server/</link>
		<comments>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/hps-well-hidden-secret-blade-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Houston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BL2x220c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bladesystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converged network adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Xeon 5500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Itanium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinbladeguy.wordpress.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP&#8217;s BladeSystem server offering is quite extensive &#8211; everything from a 4 CPU Intel blade to an Itanium CPU blade, however their most well hidden, secret blade is their BL2x220c blade server.  Starting at $6,129, this blade server is an awesome feet of design because it is not just 1 server, it is 2 serversin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fbladesmadesimple.com%252F2009%252F10%252Fhps-well-hidden-secret-blade-server%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22HP%26%23039%3Bs%20Well%20Hidden%20Secret%20Blade%20Server%20%23BL2x220c%20%23blade%20%23bladesystem%20%23cna%20%23converged%20network%20adapter%20%23HP%20%23Integrity%20%23Intel%20%23Intel%20Xeon%205500%20%23Itanium%20%23virtualization%22%20%7D);"></div>
<div id="attachment_41" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-41 " title="bl2x220cg5" src="http://kevinbladeguy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/bl2x220cg5.jpg" alt="bl2x220cg5" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">BL2x220c G5 (2 server &quot;nodes&quot; shown)</p></div>
<p style="text-align:left;">HP&#8217;s BladeSystem server offering is quite extensive &#8211; everything from a <a href="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/en/WF25a/3709945-3709945-3328410-241641-3722793-3454580.html" target="_blank">4 CPU Intel blade </a>to an <a href="http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/blades/components/c-class-integrity-bladeservers.html" target="_blank">Itanium CPU blade</a>, however their most well hidden, secret blade is their <a href="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/en/WF25a/3709945-3709945-3328410-241641-3722790-3707371.html" target="_blank">BL2x220c blade </a>server.  Starting at $6,129, this blade server is an awesome feet of design because it is not just 1 server, it is <strong>2 servers</strong>in 1 blade case &#8211; in a clam shell design (see below).  This means that in a HP C7000 BladeSystem chassis you could have <strong>32 servers! </strong>   That&#8217;s 64 CPUs, 256 CORES, 2TB of RAM all in a 10U rack space.  That&#8217;s pretty impressive.  Let me break it down for you.  Each &#8220;node&#8221; on a single 2 node BL2x220c G5 server contains:</p>
<ul>
<li>Up to two Quad-Core <span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>Intel® Xeon®</strong> <strong>5400</strong></span> sequence processors</li>
<li>Up to 32 GB (4 x 8 GB) of memory, supported by (4) slots of PC2-5300 Registered DIMMs, 667 MHz</li>
<li>1 non-hot plug small form factor SATA or Solid State hard drive</li>
<li>Embedded Dual-port NC326i Gigabit Server Adapter</li>
<li>One (1) I/O expansion slots via mezzanine card</li>
<li>One (1) internal USB 2.0 connector for security key devices and USB drive keys</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://kevinbladeguy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/bl2x220.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-42" title="BL2x220" src="http://kevinbladeguy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/bl2x220.jpg" alt="BL2x220" width="329" height="250" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><span style="color:#000000;">You may have noticed that this server is a &#8220;G5&#8243; version and currently has the older Intel 5400 series processors.  Based on HP&#8217;s current blade offering, expect to see HP refresh of this server to a &#8220;G6&#8243; model that will contain the </span><span style="color:#ff0000;"><span style="color:#ff0000;">Intel® Xeon® 5500 series processors</span><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="color:#000000;">.  Once that happens, I expect for <span style="text-decoration:underline;">more memory</span>slots to come with it, since the Intel® Xeon® 5500 series processors have 3 memory channels.  I&#8217;m guessing 12 memory slots &#8220;per node&#8221; or 24 memory slots per BL2x220c G6.  Purely speculation on my part, but it would make sense. </span>  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#ff0000;"><span style="color:#000000;">Why do I consider this server to be one of HP&#8217;s best hidden secrets?  Simply because with that amount of server density, server processing power and server memory, the BL2x220c <em>could</em> become a perfect virtualization server.   Now if they&#8217;d only make a converged network adapter (CNA)&#8230;</span></span></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bladesmadesimple.com/2009/10/hps-well-hidden-secret-blade-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

