Are Blade Servers Dead, or the Future of the DataCenter?

As I talk with customers, I often run into camps who either love blade servers or they absolutely hate them – and will never use them.  I even hear some people think blade servers are dying off, but I think that is far from the case.  In fact, I believe that blade servers could be the future of the datacenter and here’s why.  Six years ago, I wrote a blog post about the future of the datacenter being a modular design where there would be shelves of storage, compute, memory, etc. all connected via a “rack plane” (I coined that phrase if it ever takes off…)   It was a vision that would allow for a dis-aggregation of compute components but at the time there was no real technology to make it happen.  That vision is closer to reality with the creation of the Gen-Z Consortium.  The Consortium’s initial members were AMD, ARM, Broadcom, Cray, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Huawei, IDT, Micron, Samsung, SK Hynix and Xilinx (see the full current member list at  This Consortium was created with the goal of creating an open systems interconnect that can provide memory semantic access to data and devices via direct-attached, switched or fabric topologies as shown below.

Aside from the concept of connecting devices together, Gen-Z is striving toward full duplex, aggregate bandwidths with 32 lanes achieving  25GT/s (200GB/s) up to 112GT/s (896GB/s).  As technology advances and CPU vendors integrate Gen-Z into the processor, the Gen-Z bridge goes away and Gen-Z will support 64 lanes taking that from 400GB/s to 1792GB/s.

Gen-Z has some other cool high performance features built in that include low latency access to storage class memory (SCM), and hardware driven multi-link and multi-path for network traffic to name a few.  (Check out the link at the bottom for more details on these features.)

To get back to my original point,  I believe that blade, or “modular” servers will be a fundamental hardware design for Gen-Z architecture.  When you review the Gen-Z Consortium’s vision of deployment models you’ll see it is a very modular design.  The image below not only highlights the modularity but also the idea of carving out pools of resources based upon the application needs.  This is where it gets cool because Gen-Z could let us partition off our resources into the physical pools we need.

While Gen-Z looks amazing and promises to be the best thing since sliced bread, I don’t think we’ll see the technology anytime soon, however, I encourage you set up a Google alert and keep your eye on what’s happening with it.  If this interests you, I encourage you to take an hour and watch the video, “The Gen Z Tenets” on YouTube at

I’d love to know your thoughts on this.  Leave me a comment below or hit me up on Twitter (@kevin_houston).


Kevin Houston - Founder, BladesMadeSimple.comKevin Houston is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of  He has 20 years of experience in the x86 server marketplace.  Since 1997 Kevin has worked at several resellers in the Atlanta area, and has a vast array of competitive x86 server knowledge and certifications as well as an in-depth understanding of VMware and Citrix virtualization.  Kevin has worked at Dell EMC since August 2011 working as a Server Sales Engineer covering the Global Enterprise market from 2011 to 2017 and currently works as a Chief Technical Server Architect supporting the Central Region.


Disclaimer: The views presented in this blog are personal views and may or may not reflect any of the contributors’ employer’s positions. Furthermore, the content is not reviewed, approved or published by any employer. No compensation has been provided for any part of this blog.





2 thoughts on “Are Blade Servers Dead, or the Future of the DataCenter?

  1. Pingback: The Gen-Z Consortium: A Blade By Any Other Name? - Gestalt IT

  2. Pingback: Are Blade Servers Dead, or the Future of the DataCenter? – Real World UCS

Comments are closed.